On January 1, 2023, Ana Walshe disappeared from her Cohasset, Massachusetts home—only for the investigation to unearth chilling clues pointing to her husband, Brian Walshe.

Now standing trial, Walshe, a federal art fraud convict, is accused of murdering and dismembering Ana before hurling her remains into a transfer station dumpster.

The case hinges on unsettling digital and forensic evidence that implicates Ana’s husband—and the credibility of that evidence may hang on controversies surrounding the State Police handling of the case.

Prior to his wife’s disappearance, Brian Walshe had already been ensnared in legal troubles. In 2021, he pleaded guilty in federal court for orchestrating a scheme involving counterfeit Andy Warhol paintings, earning a sentence of over three years and facing a restitution order of $475,000

At the time Ana vanished, he was under house arrest for the fraud charges—a restriction prosecutors emphasized, noting he had limited freedom to leave the home alone.

Surveillance & Purchases

🩸Video footage shows Walshe visiting a hardware store on January 2, buying approximately $450 worth of cleaning supplies, allegedly in cash.

🩸He also purchased area rugs the same day, activity prosecutors say was meant to conceal bloodstains.

Blood & Weapons Found

🩸A basement search at the Walshe home turned up visible blood spatter and a bloody knife.

🩸At a Peabody transfer station, investigators recovered ten bags containing a bloody hacksaw, a hatchet, and Ana’s COVID-19 vaccination card and necklace—all items confirmed via DNA.

Digital Trail of Horror

🩸Prosecutors revealed chilling Google search history—terms like

“dismemberment and the best ways to dispose of a body”

“how long before a body starts to smell” 

“can you be charged with murder without a body”

—conducted soon after Ana’s disappearance. Searches reportedly were made on his and his son’s devices

No Body, But Compelling Indicia

💔Although Ana’s remains have never been found, the combination of the digital evidence, forensic analysis, and Walshe’s suspicious conduct forms a compelling circumstantial case.

Authorities maintain it’s more than enough to link him to her likely death.

A trio of Massachusetts State Police troopers—Sergeant Yuri Bukhenik and Troopers Connor Keefe and Nicholas Guarino—testified during the May 2025 evidentiary hearing about how Walshe became the primary suspect.

Their testimony outlined the transformation of the case from a missing-person inquiry into a homicide investigation.

But the State Police link doesn’t end there. Trooper Michael Proctor—who once led both the Walshe and Karen Read investigations—was terminated after sending vulgar and biased texts during the Read case. Proctor has since been barred from testifying in Walshe’s trial, and prosecutors confirm he won’t be called because of his misconduct.

Meanwhile, Sgt. Bukhenik was recently reassigned from the Norfolk DA’s office to State Police training, in a “temporary duty assignment”—a move following disciplinary action over Proctor’s behavior under his supervision.

This has placed the case’s investigative integrity under scrutiny. Walshe’s defense is actively pushing suppression motions, arguing that the investigators’ past biases—especially Proctor’s—could taint their collection and handling of critical evidence.

Lead Prosecutor: ADA Tracey Cusick & ADA Greg Connor

In December 2024, Judge Diane Freniere assumed oversight of the Walshe case in Norfolk Superior Court. Like the Karen Read case, Walshe’s defense strategy is similar—in part because defense attorneys have subpoenaed records concerning Michael Proctor’s conduct in that parallel investigation

On July 25, 2025, Judge Freniere denied Walshe’s motion to suppress the Google search data obtained from his son’s iPad, a ruling pivotal to the Commonwealth’s evidentiary case.

With trial set for October 20, 2025, the spotlight is squarely on when and whether the defense succeeds in shrinking the Commonwealth’s evidence footprint—whether it’s digital footprints, DNA, or search warrants executed across the Walshe home and devices.

If major components are ruled inadmissible, it could significantly weaken the prosecution’s case.

But if the State Police’s methods are upheld, and the DNA and forensic discoveries are allowed into trial, the prosecution’s narrative becomes all the more compelling. The fate of this case may hinge on the judge’s upcoming rulings.

Related Articles